
In the textile sector, a number of plasma applications are conceivable and some have been
tested in laboratory scale. The chemical functionality and/or the morphology of a fiber
surface can be altered in order to improve very different properties to tailor them for
certain demands. The wettability can be increased to achieve a better impregnation or a
deeper dying or, in contrast; it also can be decreased to create a water repellent behavior.
New chemical functionalities on the surface can promote the reactivity with dyes. The
adhesion in laminates can be enhanced largely. The waterfree removal of sizings seems to be
possible. These are only a few examples that demonstrate the potential of this technology.
Since the mid 80ties a plant has been running in Russia where low pressure plasma is
utilized to oxidize fiber surfaces for improved dying. This is one of the very rare
examples of plasma application in textile industry. What are the reasons that prevent
a broader application of this new and promising technology?
It is only rather recently that the textile industry and plasma technology took notice
from each other and started looking for fields that could take advantage from plasmas.
On both sides there are some specific demands. Plasma is based on low pressure and needs
vacuum equipment which is not common at all in textile industry. On the other hand,
textiles have a rather large specific surface area and contain usually a substantial
amount of water. Both facts ask for a good vacuum system, a better one than it is needed
for the treatment of films or other solid parts. The role of water in plasma treatments
is an important issue that needs to be investigated in more detail for non-oxidative
processes.
The surface properties alterations obtained by a plasma treatment are complex. Particle
induced reactions take usually place in the upper ten nanometers of a surface. Short
wavelength UV-radiation as it is emitted by low pressure plasmas initiates reactions in
a thicker layer (about 100 nm). The relation between the two and the extent of both can
be controlled by the process gas and other process parameters. The outermost surface,
only some atom layers, sometimes less than 1 nm, determines the interaction with other
media. The chemical composition of this part of a fiber is responsible for good or bad
adhesion in laminates or whether the fabric is suitable for impregnation or not. Exactly
this part of a fiber can be modified by a plasma. For the success of the treatment not
only the process parameters contribute, but also the original surface is crucial. Trace
amounts of sizings, for example, can modify the reaction condition substantially and have
to be taken into consideration for almost every process.
Technology
Many different types of treatments have been done so far in batch experiments. This is a
legitimate way to demonstrate that a certain treatment can create a desired effect.
However, for an industrial application a continuous process is inevitable. There are
basically two types of vacuum equipment to realize a continuous web treatment:
-
In an air-to-air system the material passes several differential pumping stages
before it reaches the actual process chamber and after it had left it. This allows
a real continuous treatment and is particularly suitable if one material is
treated in one process for a long period of time without changes. The metalization
of polymer films is done with this technology.
-
For the treatment of different materials, a semi-continuous or roll-to-roll
technique is usually more reliable. Deviations of the materials properties as for
example thickness and water content can be controlled easier than in a continuous
treatment. In particular for technological investigations this is the way to go.
Our roll-to-roll plasma reactor
Considering the things that were discussed in the last paragraphs, we set up an apparatus
for technological investigations on
semi-continuous roll-to-roll treatments of webs.
Application examples from our laboratory
Most of the problems that arise when textiles are treated with plasma do not apply when
the surface has to be oxidized in the plasma for example to create polar and reactive
functional groups. In that case the background pressure in the reactor is not so
important and also the water from the webs can be utilized in the treatment. The only
real danger is an overtreatment. In a prolonged plasma exposure, polymers form low
molecular weight substances which can deteriorate the surface properties, can be washed
off and expose a surface which is treated to a lower extent.
More sophisticated treatments have a much narrower range of treatment conditions and
need much more care in process control. The hydrophobation in a fluorocarbon plasma is
an example for such a type of treatment.
Example 1: Water repellent polyaramide fabric
The data in the table demonstrates that a fluorocarbon plasma treatment can
reduce the soaking of fabrics in a similar way like a traditional impregnation.
However, in contrast to the wet treatment, the fabric retains its flexibility
after the plasma treatment.
| treatment |
water absorption,% |
| non |
52 |
| wet |
19 |
| plasma |
19 |
| |
|
Example 2: Water repellent cotton, hemp
 |
|
Stains of aqueous dye solutions on ordinary cotton |
 |
|
Drops of an aqueous dye solutions on hydrophobic cotton |
 |
|
Stability of hydrophobic treatment |
Cotton or hemp fabric usually absorbs water immediately.
Applying a low-pressure plasma process, the fiber's surface can be altered to
make it repell water. After the treatment, drops run freely over the surface
while mechanical properties, the visual appearance, and the permeability for
water vapor remain unchanged. The surface modification is limited to a very
thin layer. A treatment as short as 2 seconds can be sufficient to achieve
this effect in a batch process. Continuous treatments with a speed of more
than 20 m/min are conceivable.
The stability of the modification can be seen in intermitted washing cycles of
fluorocarbon treated cotton fabric. After an initial drop, the finishing remains
stable for at least two hours at 95°C. The quality of the repellent effect is
evaluated by putting water drops to the fabric surface. A value of 1 means that
the drops run freely over the surface and do not penetrate into the material
while at a value of 3 the water does not penetrate but it needs vibrations to
move the drop. Obviously this evaluation depends also on the nature of the
fabric.
Example 3: Wettability improvement
In an oxygen plasma the number of functional groups at the surface can be
increased. The increased polarity makes the material more wettable which can be
used to improve dying and sizing.
In the table we summarized examples where various polyamide fabrics were oxidized.
The effect of the treatment was checked by a water rise test, i.e. a strip of the
fabric was put into water end the time was measured until the water rise up 3 cm.
The test was repeated a certain time after the treatment. The results show a good
stability of the treatment.
Water rise time (s):
| material |
untreated |
treated |
treated, after 80 days |
| PA 1 |
96s |
16s |
18s |
| PA 2 |
18s |
7s |
10s |
| PA 3 |
558s |
51s |
78s |
| |
|
|
|
Example 4: Adhesion improvement in laminates and composites
In an oxygen plasma the number of functional groups at the surface can be
increased which can improve the adhesion to other material. The results are
stronger laminates and better composite materials.
As an example, there are results of lamintation tests with polyester fabric. (PES)
| material |
treatment |
peel force N/10 mm |
fabric failor |
| PES1/2 |
no |
28 |
no |
| PES1 |
1 |
>60 |
yes |
| PES2 |
2 |
<50 |
yes |
| |
|
|
|